JW Player uses term "Open Source", but violates Open Source Definition rule #6
I recently came across the software JW Player. It is a Flash/HTML5-based video player to use on your website. Oh, this looks great, I thought. Why haven't we used this at work, I asked myself? It is, after all, open source. Then I clicked on to the download page and I saw a piece of text that confused me at first.
By downloading, I agree to the non-commercial license.
How can a software be open source, but only for non-commercial use? That does not compute. I looked a bit further, and their free download (and source code availability) is covered by the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 license, which disallows commercial use.
Yet, if you look at the Open Source Definition rule number 6, it says the following:
6. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor
The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic research.
To me, the incompatibility with the term "Open Source" and the CC-BY-NC-SA license is quite obvious. They are actively polluting the definition of the term "Open Source", as understood by the FLOSS movement, for their own benefit.
I wrote a comment on their forum asking them to either change their use of the "Open Source" term or change the license of their software. I'm not expecting much, as they locked down a previous comment about the issue without acknowledgment.
I'm hoping that someone with more klout than myself (hopefully someone involved with the Open Source Initiative) will carry the torch and put some heat on this company for their misuse and pollution of the Open Source Definition.
But this isn't the same case of red hat/centos? One commercial and the other open source?
I found a sea shell and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said "You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear." She put the shell to her
ear and screamed. There was a hermit crab inside and
it pinched her ear. She never wants to go back!
LoL I know this is totally off topic but I had to tell someone!
of late, yet I never found any fascinating article
like yours. It is pretty value enough for me. In my view,
if all site owners and bloggers made excellent content material as you did, the internet will be a lot more useful than ever before.
I'm experiencing some minor security problems with my latest site and I would like to find something more risk-free.
Do you have any recommendations?
Tibetast Fear that documents the torture of a Tibetan Buddhist Monk and Nun and how they had the braveness,
inspired by the Dalai Lama, to move beyond fear regardless of
all of the terrible things that have been happening
to them. Now they've identified a approach to allow go of their anger and forgive their former torturers.
They understand that the Chinese individuals are also suffering.
By knowing our widespread humanity, that we're all a part of one human loved ones, we can take motion for constructive change.
The movie also highlights how are actions can support totally free political prisoners in
seemed to be on the internet the easiest thing to be aware of.
I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while people think about worries that they plainly
do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the
top and defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people
could take a signal. Will probably be back to get more.
Please stay us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.
Leave a comment
|« Implementing WWW::LastFM, a client library to the Last.FM API, with XML::Rabbit||Unicode::Collate is really, really slow »|